09-Online-The Roberts' Court and the Question of Judicial Legitimacy

09-Online-The Roberts' Court and the Question of Judicial Legitimacy

May/Summer Course | This course/event is completed

3201 Burton St. SE Grand Rapids, MI 49546 United States

Online

5/1/2024-5/8/2024

12:30 PM-1:45 PM EDT on Wed

$20.00

To assist you in preparing for this class, we have provided a link to the setup / test pages from the conference provider. If you have never used this conference service before please click on the link below so that your PC or device will be ready to participate in this class.

The 2020 swapping out of Amy Coney Barrett for the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg has given us the most conservative Supreme Court in perhaps 90 years. High profile decisions overturning long standing precedent on abortion rights, affirmative action and gun rights have led liberal legal academics and many in the media to contest the very legitimacy of the Court itself. In this course, we will take a deeper dive into the Court's work in the past five years or so, with an eye toward a better understanding of the competing notions of judicial legitimacy within the broader parameters of a democratic system of governance.  


David Ryden joined the Hope College political science faculty in 1994 and is currently director of Hope's Washington D.C. honors semester. He has published numerous books and articles on such topics as the Supreme Court and the electoral process, the faith-based initiative, as well as other issues at the intersection of religion and politics. He has participated previously with CALL on three courses related to the Supreme Court. 

Ryden, David

David Ryden, leader, joined the Hope College political science faculty in 1994 and is currently chair of the department. He has published numerous books and articles on such topics as the Supreme Court and the electoral process, as well as other issues at the intersection of religion and politics. Ryden has a BA in political science from Concordia College, a law degree from the University of Minnesota, and a PhD in political science from the Catholic University of America. He has participated twice previously with CALL on topics related to the Supreme Court.